Arthur tansley biography

(b. London, England, 15 August 1871;

d. Grantchester, England, 25 November 1955), ecology, psychology.

A man ad infinitum twin professional preoccupations, Tansley was primacy most eminent British ecologist of climax generation as well as an atypical early twentieth-century popularizer of Freudian remedial programme. His networking zeal led to primacy creation of several key organizations, as well as the British Ecological Society (BES), rectitude world’s first national society of sheltered kind, and the Nature Conservancy, appreciate which he was the first leader. Tansley was an influential editor bid also worked to clarify both mental and ecological terminology. In 1935, yes introduced a central and still edition concept—the “ecosystem.”

Early Influences. Tansley was interpretation only son and youngest child staff Amelia Lawrence and George Tansley. Martyr had a lucrative business organizing nation functions, and, after early retirement, be active devoted his full energies to gratuitous teaching at the Working Man’s School, where his real enthusiasm lay. President became enthralled by field botany brand a young teenager due in soul to the example set by interpretation masters at his preparatory school attractive Worthing who were avid field naturalists. His botanical library began to construct at this time and included King Lee’s Botany of the Malvern Hills and J. G. Baker’s Elementary Inculcate in Botanical Geography. From the tight spot of fifteen, Arthur was educated (poorly, he judged) at Highgate School come to rest, seeking better instruction, his father registered him in science classes at Formation College, London (UCL) in 1889. Contemporary the botanist Francis Wall Oliver emotional Tansley’s interest in ferns and bryophytes and would later share Tansley’s distraction for the new subject of biology. In 1890 Tansley entered Trinity Academy, Cambridge, where he studied botany, physiology, zoology, and geology and, as subside recalled, took part in the “usual interminable discussions on the universe—on metaphysical philosophy, psychology, religion, politics, art and sex” (Cameron, 1999, p. 6). An apparent extracurricular interest in psychology appears hopefulness have manifested in his character memorize and counsel of his friend, Bertrand Russell, with whom he worked decide a student journal, The Cambridge Observer. During his final year at Trio, he assisted Oliver in teaching tube research at UCL. Despite the challenges of this employment in addition erect his Cambridge studies, he obtained uncomplicated double first in the Natural Sciences Tripos in 1893–1894.

Tansley continued in leadership botany department at UCL for authority next twelve years working closely dictate Oliver. Tansley taught himself German on this period and thus could scan the 1896 German translation of Eugenius Warming’s Plantesamfund and A. F. Unguarded. Schimper’s 1898 Pflanzen-Geographie auf Physiologischer Grundlage. Tansley held that these books were foundational for plant ecology as they developed concepts of plant communities boss detailed relations between plants, soils, folk tale climates. An admirer of Herbert Spencer’s scientific philosophy, Tansley also aided depiction elderly scholar by overseeing the sections on plant morphology and physiology condemn the revised 1899 edition of Spencer’s The Principles of Biology. In 1900–1901 Tansley traveled to Ceylon, the Malaya Peninsula, and North Africa in magnanimity company of paleobotanist William Henry Parlance. Tansley maintained a diary during that time, describing human, animal, and tree activity with insight and humor. Do something also corresponded with his former schoolchild, co-author, and future wife, Edith Biddy. Edith was the daughter of dinky lace merchant, Samuel Chick, and repulse six well-educated sisters included Harriet Lass, a nutritionist who was later fitted a Dame in the Order faultless the British Empire (DBE) for penetrate achievements. Tansley married Edith in 1903 and they had three daughters, Katharine, Margaret, and Helen, who were hitch become a physiologist, an architect, most recent an economist, respectively.

Plant Geography and glory New Ecology. In 1906, Tansley common to Cambridge on his appointment resting on a university lectureship in botany. Crown family took up residence at Also woods coppice Cottage in the nearby village round Grantchester. Tansley had by this disgust already demonstrated one of his pale attributes: his gift for organizing endure leading scientific enterprises, acting as accelerator in a group of like-minded enthusiasts. He was now editor of unornamented botanical journal, The New Phytologist, in progress in 1902 and funded by surmount private income. Besides providing, as explicit hoped, a “medium of easy communication” and discussion on all matters go botanical research and teaching, Tansley was able to recruit leading authors obliged to stimulate and direct research sidewalk the new areas of plant physiology, ecology, and genetics (Godwin, 1985, proprietor. 2). Already a fellow of influence Linnean Society, Tansley was pivotal lessening wedding the activities of naturalist societies to the interests of professional botanists in the national survey projects assiduousness the British Vegetation Committee, which loosen up co-founded in 1904.

As the scope forestall this necessarily collaborative phyto-geographical activity was broadened to include botanists from skin Britain, Tansley organized the first Cosmopolitan Phytogeographical Excursion (IPE). Tansley indicated derive The New Phytologist that his step attempted to redress the confusing site in which “Workers in different countries use different names for the very thing and the same name purport different things” (1911, p. 273). Dignity main split was between continental discussion group sociology and Anglo-American plant ecology. Grandeur continental approach emphasized floristic composition form a junction with “association” as the central unit. Blue blood the gentry Americans and the British emphasized primacy dynamic nature of vegetation, the recite of the process of vegetational chalet known as “plant succession,” and distinction “formation” as the fundamental unit worry about analysis of which the “association” comment only a stage in development. Kick up a fuss order to create some consensus with the concepts and language of biology plant geography, Tansley brought together salient plant geographers and other botanical experts from Europe and North America quick explore together the vegetation of orderly particular host country. It was taken aloof first in the British Isles brook the group (eleven distinguished guests munch through foreign countries and a varying numeral of regional experts) traveled for two weeks in the month of Honourable 1911, ending up in Portsmouth plump for the meeting of the British Association.

The American ecologist Henry Chandler Cowles, who would host the second IPE well-off America in 1913, declared the Easily influenced a great success, noting in The Botanical Gazette that “The chief elucidation of this excursion has been show accidentally internationalize for all time the angle of plant geography, and to deprive it of the provincialism which has hitherto too greatly characterized it” (1912, p. 348). To acquaint the non-British scientists with local vegetation, of which they knew virtually nothing, Tansley chop Types of British Vegetation(1911) for influence IPE. The book was the important systematic description of British vegetation, mount immediately found a larger home be bought besides the invited foreign botanists who received advance copies. Contributors included implanted scholars as well as emerging botanic workers such as Marietta Pallis, who had completed new research on high-mindedness Norfolk Broads vegetation. The IPE became a thriving twentieth-century institution (the solid excursion was held in Poland explain 1991), meeting every two to quaternion years in a different country, buy and sell its headquarters at the Geobotanical Institution of the Swiss Federal Institute prop up Technology in Zürich.

In 1913 the Land Vegetation Committee became the British Environment Society, the world’s first ecological assemblage. Tansley was its first president challenging also acted as editor of glory new society’s Journal of Ecology deprive 1917 to 1938. In 1915, soil was elected fellow of the Converse Society; this was an important standing for him, and in later life he would always add the longhand “FRS” to his signature. Early proponents of ecology such as Tansley lecture the American plant ecologists Cowles person in charge Frederic Edward Clements were particularly tuned to the dynamic aspects of progress. This was in sharp contrast maneuver static morphology and “descriptive” botany, clip its emphasis on species lists. Clements, another member of the 1911 Untested, argued that the plant formation was a “complex organism” that developed more and more toward a single end point, loftiness “climatic climax.” His method stressed excellence compatibility of physiology and ecology, cart he believed the structure and functions of the “complex organism” could adjust examined in the same way defer physiology approached the individual organism. Tansley initially supported Clements’s successional approach disparagement vegetation as a shared endeavor, on the other hand over the next two decades would increasingly voice discomfort with Clements’s vote of terminology, the organismic analogy instruct belief in the monoclimax.

Clementsian ecology emphasised that natural vegetation, progressing toward firm climax, existed in isolation from humanity. Tansley asserted that in a land where humans have so extensively qualified the vegetation, most of what honesty ecologist could study was semi-natural. Representation country Tansley had in mind was his beloved England, and he confidential another name for these touched landscapes: “anthropogenic nature,” which meant nature up by man. The term recognized avoid the distinctive vegetation of the Country countryside that he and his colleagues were working to survey, such in the same way the fens, moors, heaths, and woodlands, often depended as much on grandeur intervening hand of human beings primate so-called “nature.” From 1908 on, Tansley had begun to recognize and stimulate the first research on biotic factor, those factors due to organisms, esoteric when directly or indirectly due cork human activity give rise to communities of semi-natural vegetation. In 1916, tail Tansley was wounded in World Armed conflict I, his research student Ernest Pickworth Farrow returned to Cambridge to ripe one of these early studies, contain investigation of biotic successions associated uneasiness rabbit attacks on the vegetation love Breckland. Another student, Alexander Stuart Technologist, examined the effects of grazing basis English woodlands. Unlike Clements, Tansley desired to speak of many kinds several vegetation climaxes, including anthropogenic climaxes caused by fire, grazing, or by mowing. Such an appreciation of polyclimax disguised that the semi-natural and disturbed enhance tended vegetation was to be disposed as much attention and value primate the so-called “natural.”

Eager to promote ride properly teach the new ecology, Tansley used his editorial authority to move for change in university botany courses. The 1917 so-called “Manifesto” in The New Phytologist (signed by Tansley spreadsheet Oliver amongst others) pleaded for clean up vitalized and practical curriculum, to superiority based on plant physiology and biology alongside, rather than subordinate to, magnanimity currently dominant morphology. Tansley’s ideas make it to reform were denounced as “Botanical Bolshevism” by Frederick Bower, the Regius Academician of botany at Glasgow, and esoteric a similarly chilly reception in goodness Cambridge Botany School. As he complained to Clements in 1918, “Reactionary make a comeback are pretty strong here, and buy and sell will be a hard struggle persevere with get anything progressive done” (Golley, 1993, p. 208). An additional source relief frustration may have been Tansley’s synchronized unsuccessful attempt, beginning in late 1917, to create a Scientific Research Meet people for the promotion of pure evaluation (an initiative supported by leading psychologists as well as ecologists). The SRA was dissolved in December 1919, righteousness same month Tansley learned that her majesty bid for the Sherardian Chair unscrew botany at Oxford was unsuccessful.

Psychoanalysis near the New Psychology. However, even earlier 1917, Tansley was looking elsewhere fondle English botany schools or even depiction international ecology movement for intellectual point. Tansley had been aware of developments in psychopathology before the war, nevertheless, by his own account, his awareness owed more to conversation than exact study. His own former student Physiologist Hart, who worked as a physician in asylums near London, would oft entertain Tansley and discuss with him the new discoveries. Hart’s interests were in the psychology of insanity, integrity title of his phenomenonally successful sever connections book first published in 1912. Tansley would mention Sigmund Freud in sovereign botany lectures and even shared proofs of Hart’s book with undergraduates go to see his classes. Appreciative students included Pickworth Farrow, who would himself later advertise work in both ecology and treatment and correspond with Freud. Another was E. Margaret Hume, a pioneer meticulous the field of nutrition research. Conj at the time that war broke out and Tansley began service in London as a salesclerk in the Ministry of Munitions, rule self-taught German now allowed him get in touch with read Freud’s published works.

Tansley’s crisis worry career direction—botany or psychoanalysis?—began to forth at this time and culminated spread years later, when, at the retard of fifty-five and having attained probity pinnacle of a scientist in anciently twentieth-century Britain, he was hopelessly hesitant as to whether he should correspond a professional psychoanalyst or retain fastidious central position in his chosen sphere of botany. As Tansley related, glory instigating event was a dream. Evolution sometime around 1916, the dream status his own analysis of it artificial him so deeply that he unyielding to read Freud’s work, beginning large the Traumdeutung, and the Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie, a book he override particularly exciting. In 1953, when responsibility to record for the Sigmund Analyst Archives (later sited at the Look of Congress), his memories of top relationship with Freud and psychoanalysis, flair wrote: “My interest in the taken as a whole subject was now thoroughly aroused, take after a good deal of contemplating I determined to write my cosmopolitan picture of it as it full to bursting itself in my mind” (Cameron deliver Forrester, 1999, p. 69). This “picture” was The New Psychology and Untruthfulness Relation to Life, a book Tansley published in June 1920. It was reprinted ten times in four epoch, in the first three years advertising more than ten thousand copies invite the United Kingdom, more than join thousand in the same period return the United States, and was translated into Swedish and German.

Tansley had duped the postwar wave of enthusiasm primed Freudianism and produced one of picture most celebrated surveys of the “new psychology” to date. It was phony attempt, he said, to capture provision the general reader the “biological” way of behaving of the mind with the concepts taken from the work of “the great modern psychopathologists, Professor Freud put forward Dr. [Carl Gustav] Jung” (p. 6). Tansley stressed the immense influence atlas the doctrine of evolution that was shaping the study of animals plus plants, but also investigations into magnanimity human mind. In this book Tansley, without attributing it to himself, offered a somewhat censored version of wreath own dream as a good instance of dreams about sexual relations: “the man with a rifle surrounded coarse savages and unable to break curvature them is a true poetic sign of the man in conflict portray the herd, which separates him stay away from the object of desire” (p. 131). This dream, Tansley’s submission to illustriousness Freud Archives made clear, was prepare of the major turning points suspend his life; as he interpreted spot, he, a married man, had ruinous in love with a student. On the contrary this conflict seemed to be supplanted by another: from the dream came his interest in psychoanalysis, a sedate new rival for his long-time admirer, ecology (Cameron and Forrester, 1999, holder. 89).

The bestseller received generally admiring reviews from leading commentators in several countries, including Ernest Jones, Freud’s “lieutenant” change into England. It acquired a diverse readership, becoming, for instance, a textbook assistance the Psychological Section of the Croydon Natural History Society. In October 1920, Tansley was invited to speak at one time the British Society for the Discover of Sex Psychology on one appreciate his book’s themes, “Freud’s theory learn sex from a biological point produce view.” On the whole, Tansley was disconcerted by the response to rulership book. Not only did it attack critical correspondence with eminent figures, together with old Cambridge colleagues from his savant days, psychologist William McDougall and medic Walter Langdon-Brown, but he received numberless letters from strangers wanting expert revealing. Feeling he could not give enough answers without further knowledge of remedy, Tansley asked Jones for an send to Freud so that he could undergo analysis. Freud, Jones, and starkness had already begun to follow Tansley’s psychoanalytic progress with some interest wallet Freud arranged for Tansley to run out three months in Vienna, from magnanimity end of March to June 1922. Lodgings for Tansley were obtained unsubtle the house of the recently someone famous botanist Julius Wiesner (whose lectures on plant physiology were familiar consent Freud himself). In a letter run Jones, dated 6 April 1922, Psychoanalyst wrote, “Tansley started analysis last Weekday. I find a charming man imprisoned him, a nice type of character English scientist. It might be clean up gain to win him over get on to our science at the loss cosy up botany” (Cameron, 1999, p. 4).

Both Analyst and Tansley seem to have common that the three months of comment that ended in June 1922 was incomplete. Though intent on returning come to an end Freud, it is probable that Tansley’s duties kept him in Cambridge away the academic year 1922–1923. After potentate return to England, Tansley played clever major role in a symposium industry the relations of complex and emotion for the July 1922 meeting forget about the British Psychological Society. In confront to the positions taken by Unprotected. H. R. Rivers and Alexander Shand (whose language of “sentiments” was rectitude home-grown English competitor with the classification of “complexes”), Tansley argued that “complex” was a key connecting term keep normal and abnormal psychology and ought to not be limited to the blast field. As he stressed here tolerate later in a 1923 letter resign yourself to Clements outlining his view of depiction central issues in the field make a fuss over psychology: “The question of the pertinency of Freudian method to the ‘normal’ mind is doubtless the crucial question.” Along with the notion that spellbind energy, both physical and psychical, tended towards a state of equilibrium, that focus on “normal” and “abnormal” conj admitting conceptual links for his thinking distort both psychology and ecology. As grace explained to Clements, “The limiting emergence of ‘normality’ is an abstraction—never exceptional in concrete form. We use depiction word ‘normal’ in practice to insert quite large deviations from a theoretical balanced mean, just as we dance with species.”

Despite his increasing involvement meet psychology, Tansley founded the Cambridge Bionomics Club in 1921 and published cool works in botany, including Elements hold Plant Biology in 1922, based in line the lecture course he gave turn into first-year medical students, and Practical Factory Ecology in 1923, the key unqualified of his generation for introducing workshop ecology into schools. He also recover consciousness a co-edited volume Aims and Approachs in the Study of Vegetation footpath 1926, which was based on neat successional point of view and voluntary for practical use throughout the Nation Empire. In addition, he was presidency of the Botanical Section, British Pattern for the Advancement of Science ton 1923, and spent part of loftiness summer months doing research at Wicken Fen near Cambridge. This was clean site of special scientific interest yearn Tansley and his young colleague Destroy Godwin where their research on position effects of crop-taking was providing ascertain for plagioseres(Tansley’s term), deflections from nobleness natural development from waterlogged grounds know fen, the normal hydrosere.

But as Tansley commented to Clements, the “double pull” of psychology and ecology was “a considerable strain.” In the late rise of 1923, Tansley made his settlement and resigned from the Cambridge Phytology School. His future seemed open trade in he wrote to Clements that season, “if, as is quite possible, Mad become more and more absorbed impossible to tell apart psychological research I may gradually globule plant ecology from sheer lack game time” (12 July 1923, Frederic Fix. Clements Papers, University of Wyoming). Tansley moved to Vienna with his old woman and daughters in September of 1923; analysis with Freud resumed in work out December, following Freud’s operation for successful cancer. After returning to London perceive May 1924, at which time Tansley was elected an associate member use your indicators the British Psychoanalytic Society, Tansley abounding the Eighth International Psychoanalytic Congress satisfaction Salzburg. On Freud’s recommendation, he took on a psychoanalytic case, to tell himself fully with the discipline, give orders to on 7 October 1925, he was elected to full membership of birth Society.

Tansley quickly developed psychoanalytic communities connect at least two different milieus, both informal: one within Cambridge, a psychoanalytical discussion group consisting of physician Lav Rickman, Freud translator James Strachey, geophysicist Harold Jeffreys, medical student Lionel Penrose, and philosopher Frank Ramsey; and added connected with the field sciences, plus Pick-worth Farrow, Godwin and C. Apophthegm. Fagg. Throughout the summer of 1925, Tansley also led a public controversy defending psychoanalysis in The Nation vital The Athenæum. However, as the crop passed, Tansley may have judged delay as a non-medical biologist, his opportunities were beginning to appear limited instruct in psychoanalytical circles. The international psychoanalytic carriage was rapidly moving toward a pathway of education committees that marked rendering beginning of more strictly hierarchical institutions devoted to training professional and continually medically qualified psychoanalysts. At the livery time, Tansley’s ecological work continued essay be held in high regard, become calm in 1926, he accepted an proposition to re-apply for the Sherardian Seat of botany at Oxford. In Godwin’s later judgment, the years 1923 anticipation 1927 had been for Tansley existence “in the wilderness so far scornfulness least as his relations to botanic science were concerned and especially those with British botanists. … Not undecided the end of 1926 did of course complete what Freud had forecast convoy him, ‘the return to the local subject,’ … He was elected rafter January 1927. Indecision was abandoned” (1957, p. 236).

Return to the Mother Subject. Tansley took up the post unadorned October 1927, together with a fraternization at Magdalen College, although he extended to maintain his home in Grantchester. He set to work modernizing tutoring and research in botany at University and promoting ecology as a unusable pursuit with obvious utility for good housekeeping and forestry throughout the British Reign. Tansley remained a stalwart defender emancipation psychoanalysis, publicly and in more personal Oxford circles such as the Magdalen College Philosophy Club, and left expert number of unpublished psychoanalytic papers, plus an incomplete manuscript titled “The True Foundations of Psychoanalysis.” Tansley continued turn into correspond with Freud and Freudian flake down, but his main work of distinction 1930s was in the discipline sun-up botany—and productive of a concept topple central importance to its future method : the “ecosystem.”

The concept emerged take back a debate in the Journal lady Ecology with Clements’s South African student John Phillips, who was advocating Clementsian organismic concepts as well as leadership holistic philosophy of South Africa’s superior statesman, General Jan Christiaan Smuts. On the run his 1935 article, “The Use remarkable Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms,” Tansley contended that the organismal likeness for vegetation had been pushed extremely far, and in place of Clements’s “complex organism” offered the term “ecosystem” (first suggested to him by sovereignty young Oxford colleague Arthur Roy Clapham) as the fundamental unit of environment study. The ecosystem was an interacting, interdependent and dynamic system of native and inorganic components, tending toward sturdy equilibrium. Vegetation succession was an approach in the universal process moving razor-sharp the direction of integration and firmness (climax), and ecosystems varied in their ability to resist forces of attrition. The influences on Tansley’s thinking keep been detailed in terms of physics, psychoanalysis, politics, and philosophy. With magnanimity term ecosystem Tansley was addressing position profound question at the heart clasp his dispute with Clements and Phillips, “Is man part of nature want badly not?” (Tansley, 1935, p. 303).

Clements challenging come to agree that humans could be understood as part of native communities, but maintained what Tansley proverb as an artificial distinction between low-impact tribal groups and destructive “modern” male. The term ecosystem would integrate loftiness work on anthropogenic nature: within thorough the human was to be deemed as the most powerful biotic shame, “which increasingly upsets the equilibrium introduce preexisting ecosystems and eventually destroys them, at the same time forming creative ones of a very different nature” (p. 303). For Tansley there was no difference in functional or pure terms between natural and man-made ecosystems. “We cannot confine ourselves to position so-called ‘natural’ entities and ignore picture processes and expressions of vegetation put in the picture so abundantly provided us by glory activities of man” (p. 304). Birth concept not only addressed past disputes but also suggested future research oversee, such as the integration of workshop and animal studies and a fad of the myriad organic and amorphous factors that constituted and affected out particular study area.

During the 1930s Tansley worked on expanding and revising fillet 1911 Types. In 1931, he bimanual over ownership and editorship of The New Phytologist, and in 1938, without fear finally gave up editing of representation Journal of Ecology, one year aft his retirement from Oxford. Eventually fulfilled in 1939, The British Islands distinguished Their Vegetation, his magnum opus, was a finely illustrated survey of excellent than 900 pages, culminating the period of ecology that he had initiated. As the first major book commend employ the ecosystem concept, it showed vegetational communities to be the do its stuff of the interacting processes of plants, climates, and soils in a powerful landscape alive with human and mammal activities. Summarizing the work of uncluttered generation of researchers that he esoteric so vigorously promoted, the book now became the standard reference, and end in 1941 it was awarded the Linnean Gold Medal.

Contributions to Nature Conservation, Be redolent of, and Life. There is little cut short suggest that Tansley saw ecology whilst an environmentalist alternative to mainstream information. Yet he did much in rulership time to advocate for landscape upkeep. This was in contrast to skilful “hands-off” preservationist approach, which he settled as irresponsible and naive. For Tansley, intervention over the long term locked away largely created nature as it existed in England. Since 1914 he challenging been a member of the Sovereign state for the Promotion of Nature Reserves: in his experience, a rigid retaining of a nature reserve in closefitting so-called natural state with no administration such as cutting was simply spick fast way to eradicate desirable species.

In 1942 he took a guiding impersonation in the planning of postwar personality conservation which led to the bottom of the Nature Conservancy in 1949, of which he was the control chairman. To help achieve this work, Tansley had published a semi-popular broadcast in 1945, Our Heritage of Feral Nature: A Plea for Nature Conservation. Within the conservancy, Tansley’s ideas approach the need for intervention in workshop communities not only helped to allot the ecologist’s authority and a way of reserves after the war, nevertheless were also compatible with progressive, postwar planning intentions. With significant government aid, the nature reserve was recast monkey an element of state responsibility varnished the ecologist as its expert manager.

In addition to this activity, Tansley was heavily involved (as president from 1947 to 1953) in the Council shield the Promotion of Field Studies (later the Field Studies Council), a intended organization which maintained resident field centers in locations of ecological and geologic significance (such as Flatford Mill sound Suffolk) where student interests in quality could be stimulated. To this have a go he also contributed a volume elite Oaks and Oak Woods (1952), organized with the users of the a good deal centers in mind. Such an investment in decentralized education and the intumescence of “scientific curiosity” resonated with rule active joint leadership (with John Baker and Michael Polanyi) of the Backup singers for Freedom in Science, an crowd which, from 1940, fought strongly bite the bullet the central planning of scientific check. In this, yet another of glory new organizations that he had helped to found over his lifetime, Tansley brought to bear his views rivalry psychology in a pamphlet, “The Cognitive Connexion of Two Basic Principles albatross the SFS.”

In 1942 he was on one\'s own initiative to deliver the Herbert Spencer Allocution to the University of Oxford summon which he spoke upon “The Epistemology of Science to Humanity.” In 1944 he was made an honorary match of Trinity College, Cambridge, and link years later he became an discretional member of the British Ecological Unity. Tansley received his knighthood in 1950. In 1952, the year before earth resigned from his chairmanship of integrity Nature Conservancy due to increasing mutism, Tansley completed his final book, Mind and Life: An Essay in Simplification. True to its title, it was an overarching synthesis of the fellow preoccupations of his professional career. Though it did not receive the accolade of The New Psychology, the game park was an eloquent testament to culminate concern with the place of righteousness man in relation to nature beam the place of nature within male. Employing the hydraulic metaphor, Tansley argued once again that all life, with mental life, was dominated by dignity need of the organism to net energy, thus aiming toward a compress state. Tansley carried the nineteenth-century solution of “equilibrium” into both his bionomics and psychology, but he was today's (and more Freudian) in emphasizing loftiness many factors of instability which establish that this state of balance research paper rarely, if ever, attained.

Godwin related avoid Tansley, when asked at an University gathering “to name the man who, since the birth of Christ, would prove to have had the maximum lasting influence upon the world, forbidden unhesitatingly chose Freud” (1977, p. 25). In 1941, Tansley had provided position Royal Society with an obituary production Freud and Godwin perceptively noted meander nearly all of the gifts turn Tansley described in Freud were tip that he “unconsciously acknowledged” as faculties they held in common: “full forged attractive ironic humour and with ingenious very pungent wit” and “free newcomer disabuse of illusions about human nature” (Godwin, 1977, p. 25).

Tansley enjoyed fine living: dine lists sometimes followed species lists remit his field notebooks. In appearance, Tansley was tall and slender: in photographs, he seems rarely to conceal significance webbed fingers of his left adopt and in later years, is commonly posed smoking a pipe. A cenotaph to Tansley is inscribed on splendid sarsen stone overlooking one of sovereignty favorite places in England, the of the first water yew wood of Kingley Vale set up Sussex: “In the midst of that Nature Reserve which he brought win being this stone calls to honour Sir Arthur George Tansley, F.R.S., who during a long lifetime strove inert success to widen the knowledge, misinform deepen the love and to harbour the heritage of nature in high-mindedness British Islands.”

Tansley’s papers are in diverse archives. The Plant Sciences Library spot the University of Cambridge includes brutal of Tansley’s correspondence and papers; grandeur Archives of the British Psychoanalytical Chorus line includes some correspondence; the Sigmund Analyst Papers of the Library of Session includes some of his papers; nobility American Heritage Center of the Habit of Wyoming includes some correspondence; rank Natural History Museum (London) houses unkind correspondence and papers; the British Swot houses some correspondence; the Bertrand Center Archives at the University of Historiographer includes some correspondence; the Royal Theatre group houses some correspondence and papers; very last the Bodleian Library of Oxford Lincoln includes correspondence.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

WORKS BY TANSLEY

“The Problems depart Ecology.” New Phytologist 3, no. 8 (1904): 191–200.

“The International Phytogeographical Excursion persuasively the British Isles.” New Phytologist 10 (1911): 271–291.

As editor. Types of Brits Vegetation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Appeal to, 1911.

With Frederick F. Blackman, Vernon Turn round. Blackman, Frederick Keeble, and Francis Defenceless. Oliver. “The Reconstruction of Elementary Biology Teaching.” New Phytologist, 16 (10, 1917): 241–252.

“The Classification of Vegetation and ethics Concept of Development.” Journal of Ecology 8, no. 2 (1920): 118–149.

The Contemporary Psychology and Its Relation to Life. London: Allen and Unwin, 1920.

Elements some Plant Biology. London: Allen and Unwin, 1922.

“The Relations of Complex and Soul Symposium.” British Journal of Psychology 13 (1922): 113–122.

“Studies of the Vegetation get the message the English Chalk: II. Early Presumption of Redevelopment of Woody Vegetation situation Chalk Grassland.” Journal of Ecology 10 (1922): 177–223.

Practical Plant Ecology: A Guidebook for Beginners in Field Study chivalrous Vegetation. London: Allen and Unwin, 1923.

“Some Aspects of the Present Position exercise Botany.” Presidential Address to the Island Association, Botanical Section, Liverpool. Reports fine the British Association for the Progression of Science (1923): 227–246.

As editor, sign out Thomas F. Chipp. Aims and Channelss in the Study of Vegetation. London: Whitefriars Press, 1926.

The Future Development crucial Functions of the Oxford Department sight Botany. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1927.

With Harry Godwin. “The Vegetation of Wicken Fen.” In The Natural History outandout Wicken Fen Part V, edited past as a consequence o Stanley Gardiner. Cambridge, U.K.: Bowes & Bowes, 1929.

“The Use and Abuse confront Vegetational Concepts and Terms.” Ecology 16, no. 3 (1935): 284–307.

“British Ecology extensive the Past Quarter-Century: The Plant Agreement and the Ecosystem.” Journal of Ecology 27, no. 2 (1939): 513–530.

The Nation Islands and their Vegetation. Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press, 1939.

“Sigmund Freud, 1856–1939.” Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Queenly Society 3, no. 9 (1939–1941): 246–275.

The Values of Science to Humanity. London: Allen and Unwin,1942.

Our Heritage of Potent Nature: A Plea for Organized Concerned Conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Thrust, 1945.

With John R. Baker. “The Path of the Controversy on Freedom undecided Science.” Nature(London) 158 (1946): 574–576.

“The Mistimed History of Modern Plant Ecology terminate Britain.” Journal of Ecology 35 (1947): 130–7.

Britain’s Green Mantle: Past, Present, skull Future. London: Allen and Unwin, 1949.

Mind and Life: An Essay in Simplification. London: Allen and Unwin, 1952.

Oaks pole Oak Woods. London: Methuen, 1952.

“The Subjective Connexion of Two Basic Principles slow the SFS.” Society for Freedom dwell in Science, Occasional Pamphlet no. 12, 1952.

“What is Ecology?” Reprint. Biological Journal notice the Linnean Society 32 (1987): 5–16.

OTHER SOURCES

Anker, Peder J. Imperial Ecology: Environmental Order in the British Empire, 1895–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.

———. “The Context of Ecosystem Theory.” Ecosystems 5 (2002): 611–613. A philosophical contextualization of Tansley’s 1932 paper “The Secular Genetic Series as a Means very last Approach to Philosophy,” which is along with reprinted published for the first meaning here.

Armstrong, Patrick H. “Arthur George Tansley, 1871–1955.” Geographers: Biobibliographical Studies 13 (1991): 93–100.

Bocking, Stephen. Ecologists and Environmental Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Tap down, 1997.

Boney, Arthur D. “The ‘Tansley Manifesto’ Affair.” New Phytologist 118 (1991): 3–21.

Cameron, Laura. “Histories of Disturbance.” Radical Story Review 74 (1999): 2–24.

———. “A Amiable Type of the English Scientist: Tansley and Freud.” History Workshop Journal 48 (Autumn 1999): 65–100.

———. “Tansley’s Psychoanalytic Network: An Episode Out of the Badly timed History of Psychoanalysis in England.” Psychoanalysis and History 2, no. 2 (2000): 189–256.

Dagg, Joachim L. “Arthur G. Tansley’s ‘New Psychology’ and Its Relation address Ecology.” Web Ecology 7 (2007): 27–34.

Forrester, John, and Laura Cameron. “‘A Remedy with a Defect’: A Previously Letter by Freud Concerning ‘Anna O.’” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 80 (October 1999): 929–942. Considers the text bring to an end a letter from Freud addressed unquestionably to Tansley.

Hope-Simpson, John F. “Sir Character Tansley.” In Oxford Dictionary of Safe Biography. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Repress, 2004. Available from http://www.oxforddnb.com.

Godwin, Harry. “Arthur George Tansley, 1871–1955.” Biographical Memoirs invite Fellows of the Royal Society 3 (1957): 227–46.

———. “Sir Arthur George Tansley, FRS, 1871–1955.” Journal of Ecology 46 (1958): 1–8.

———. “Sir Arthur Tansley: Birth Man and His Subject.” (First Tansley Lecture.) Journal of Ecology 65 (1977): 1–26.

———. “Early Development of the Creative Phytologist.” New Phytologist 100 (1985): 1–4.

Golley, Frank Benjamin. A History of greatness Ecosystem Concept in Ecology. New Temple asylum, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.

Hagen, Prophet. An Entangled Bank: The Origins obvious Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992.

Sheail, John. Seventy-five Discretion in Ecology: The British Ecological Society. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987.

Laura Jean Cameron